62 Comments
User's avatar
J C's avatar

I could listen to the two of you for days. Thank you so much.

Cheska1960's avatar

I love and appreciate every person who contributes their knowledge and wisdom to this new independent media world we are now in. I've been around since Mr. Cronkite, and the media explosion we are all now experiencing is a phenomenal change in real time every day. All that to say that Andrew and Harry are without question two of the most knowledgeable commentators in this new world. It is a special treat when they are together. (Sorry for rattling. In your 80's, rattling is a given.)

Jane M Farlow's avatar

Couldn’t agree more. And I’m in my upper 80’s. It gives us a long memory. 😊

Cheska1960's avatar

I appreciate being a teen in the 50's! We watched the music world give birth to a whole new kid on the block .. r & r. We not only watched .. we were in it! In my personal world, we didn't dance .. we bopped.

Aletha Evert's avatar

You are SO RIGHT about how effective the J6 committee was with their questioning. There was no individual grandstanding or speechifying by the representatives.

That is absolutely what needs to happen.

RJCrane's avatar

Both the 1.8bn settlement and the IRS $100 million tax relief as part of his non meritorious lawsuit should be viewed the US government giving Trump an unlawful domestic emolument in violation of the Constitution.

Untrump's avatar

All attention is on the judge in Florida. The lawsuit was a scam , and the settlement was a ruse that hid the IRS immunity! This is fraud on the court. No hocus pocus , this is another crime committed in plain site!

V Wilson's avatar

Two of my favorite people!

Jeremiah Anawalt's avatar

I don't know if this collab hasn't happened before, but bravo! My two favorite heavy hitters breaking it down for the rest of us. Thank you, Andrew and Harry!

Mary Lapka's avatar

Excellent and interesting conversation

Arthur E Gary's avatar

very amusing that the automated transcription today called Andrew & Mary's podcast "Maine Justice" 🤣

Judith Princz's avatar

Thank you both. I'm wondering if Comey whom Trump called "a dirty cop" on Meet the Press, has a defamation case once Trump is out of office.

Sandy S's avatar

We need to ban the use of AI from political ads.

Tom's avatar
Jun 10Edited

I would hope that the Democrats rehearse an orchestrated and effective examination of Blanche when he shows up.

Too often each Senator is attempting to be the one face that gets on the evening news so there's no coordination among them, you hear pretty much the same question multiple times, and there is no coherence to the examination overall.

This time the hearing need to be played as a team sport such that each successive Senator's five minutes build on and amplify a clear understanding that "this guy is not fit to be the Attorney General of the United States of America."

pakcanislupus's avatar

Would love to be a fly on the wall to watch TB squirm and stutter in Her Honor’s presence and her questioning.

Am hoping rather than a scorching within the judgements, there will be a scalding with definite sanctions enumerated and enforced.

Diana Shellenberger's avatar

I’m trying to imagine any other president, the chief executive, the commander in chief, and ostensibly the biggest American booster, betting against his own country’s welfare by refusing to pay taxes. He is such a traitor on every level.

Judith Princz's avatar

I heard you speak at the 92Y with the incomparable Lawrence O'Donnell. Bought your book and I'm reading it now. I had been enraged that after Trump's first term nothing was done to strengthen all the laws and norms that he broke. I like the idea of making lying about elections a crime. But my conclusion, based on how Trump circumvents or ignores laws and judicial rulings, is that we have to focus on getting an educated electorate capable of evaluating and focusing on a character. No edifice can protect us against a willfully criminal, characterless ,sociopath in the WH. I voted for Obama twice. Happily. I would have been crushed had he lost. But would not at all have despaired to have McCain or Romney as president. They would have been fine, ethical presidents. That's what we need. And what we do not have no.

RJCrane's avatar

The issue with Todd Blanche is that one: He was never a good lawyer despite his background. Two: He's willing to risk his law license to engage in unethical behavior that clearly violates many Bar Rules to do Trump's bidding including not recusing himself on cases that involve Trump.